The UAE in the International Court of Justice pushed on Thursday that the court does not have a jurisdiction to decide on the lawsuit filed by Sudan against it, which accuses it of violating the genocide agreement.
- The Iraqi army announces the killing of 10 terrorists in proactive operations in the middle of the country - the seventh day
- Locust swarms sweep the Libyan south and threaten food security - the seventh day
The UAE informed the Judges of the International Court of Justice that its violation of the genocide agreement by arming and financing the Rapid Palmel Support Forces is the abuse of the UN Authority.
- A protest on the second day of Eid in Tunisia, denouncing the aggression on Gaza - the seventh day
- The number of martyrs of Gaza increased to 50 and dozens of injury in violent Israeli bombing - the seventh day
- The Jordanian monarch: The displacement of the Palestinians from their homes is a threat to regional stability - the seventh day
Sudan seeks to issue the court, which is based in The Hague, with emergency orders, known as temporary measures, including the UAE demanding to do everything in its power to prevent killing and other crimes targeting the people of Al -Masalit in West Darfur.
“The idea that the UAE is somehow the engine of this reprehensible conflict in Sudan is far from the truth.”
The case was described as “the latest repetition of the insult to the applicant’s use of our international bodies as a site from which the UAE is attacked.”
The Emirates News Agency (WAM) quoted analysts as saying that the lawsuit lacked evidence and proofs, and that it is only a “flimsy attempt by the Sudanese armed forces, one of the two parties to the conflict, to distract attention from the catastrophic conflict that is taking place in Sudan and its responsibility towards it” and the resulting killing of tens of thousands of people and the displacement of millions of the Sudanese people, and causing it famine in large parts of the country.
It is noteworthy that Sudan and the UAE are both signed by the 1948 genocide agreement.
Nevertheless, the UAE has a reservation to part of the treaty, and legal experts say that it will be unlikely to continue to consider the issue.
“The International Court of Justice has said in the past that this type of reservation is permitted and is an obstacle to the continued consideration of the case. The court is likely to say the same thing in this case, which means that this case will not proceed.”
Sudan slid into a bloody conflict in mid -April 2023 when tensions between the army and the semi -military rebels in the capital, Khartoum, erupted, and extended to other regions.
